Business Coalition Voices Concerns Over Impending Rules on Green Chemistry
The Chemical Industry Council of California, along with a broad coalition of trade associations and companies, expressed concerns this week to the state Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) over draft green chemistry regulations that are expected to be released in the next several weeks. In a 10-page letter to DTSC Acting Director Maziar Movassaghi, the Green Chemistry Alliance (GCA)* outlined its concerns surrounding several problematic regulatory concepts that DTSC has indicated may be included in the green chemistry regulations. GCA has worked with the department since the passage of the Green Chemistry Initiative in 2008 to craft regulations that are workable, practical, grounded in generally accepted scientific principles, and that follow the intent and vision of the law. That law, authorized by AB 1879 (Feuer; D-
Although the draft regulations have not yet been released, the concerns articulated in the coalition letter are based on summary documents that have been provided by DTSC to the public, ongoing conversations with the department, and presentations made by the department's Green Ribbon Science Panel. CICC notes that while significant progress has been made since the release of DTSC's "Straw 2" proposal seven months ago serious issues will likely still need to be addressed in the draft regulations. "In our opinion, the proposed regulations are much improved from those which were proposed last year at this time; still our job is not finished. CICC will remain thoroughly engaged on behalf of our members for as long as it takes," said
Areas of Concern
In the letter, the GCA acknowledges that although the impending draft regulation will be just that—a draft—the details are critical and could have sweeping ramifications on virtually all industry sectors that manufacture or sell consumer products in the state. Some of the primary points made in the letter are as follows:
- The process of prioritizing and evaluating chemicals in products must be based on exposure as well as hazard, and avoid duplicative and conflicting regulatory requirements.
- Regulations should apply only to intentionally added ingredients that serve a functional purpose at or above 0.1 percent, consistent with other state, federal and international systems by which manufacturers are currently regulated.
- If DTSC fails to implement a science-based approach to screening out products with low likelihood of harm, the program will surely collapse under its own weight.
- DTSC should ensure that the regulations anticipate and fully leverage the wealth of quality information on chemicals in commerce from government agencies and inter-governmental bodies around the world as required by AB 1879.
- DTSC must ensure that the regulations are crafted in a manner that utilizes both public and private resources as efficiently and effectively as possible.
- The regulations should provide the option for manufacturers to conduct the alternatives assessment of the chemical in question.
- Confidential business information must be protected. The ability to protect certain information from competitors is essential to defending the competitive position of companies in the marketplace.
- A third party certification process for alternatives assessments it must be an option for manufacturers—not a mandate.
- The regulatory enforcement provisions should provide for industry safeguards and flexibility in regulatory actions.
- The coalition is highly opposed to certificates of compliance for all priority products whether in compliance or exempt from regulation.
- The draft regulations must ensure that manufacturer compliance with the program does not lead to excessively burdensome economic impacts.
The CICC and the GCA are working to promote a workable and practical approach that is grounded in generally accepted scientific principles and follows the intent and vision of the green chemistry law. By meeting the goals outlined in the coalition letter, DTSC can help ensure that the regulations are designed in an effective and cost-efficient manner so that
* The Green Chemistry
Green Chem & Safer Consumer Products Regs; Pollution Prevention; and Sustainability
COVID-19 and Wildfire Updates and Information
Teleconference & Web-Mtgs
1st and 3rd Fridays each month
CICC FOUNDERS & PIONEERS
The Early Years - Incorp. 1981
Members In the Spotlight
"Caught in the Act of Doing Good"
PRIORITY LEGS & REGS
2021 Legislative Updates
2021 Regulatory Updates
CICC Advocacy Updates 2021
Weekly Sacramento Updates 2021
2019 CICC Advocacy Issue Briefs
Principles that Guide CICC Legislative & Regulatory Activity
UPCOMING EVENTS, WEBINARS & PAST PRESENTATIONS
NACD Webinar - California Chemical Regulatory Process
July 15th, 2021
2021 23rd CUPA Forum - Virtual
California Unified Program Annual Training Conference, February 2 through March 18, 2021 on Tuesday, Wednesday & Thursdays
Zero Emission Forklift Workshop
with 09-22-2020 Workshop
LEG INFO & STATUS
Members, Rules, Glossary of Terms, Calendar, How a Bill Becomes Law
Session Dates and Deadlines
Official CA Legislative Info
Search by Bill No, Author or Key Word
Today In the Capitol Building
Committee Mtgs & Floor Sessions
Search 29 Separate Codes
Essential Links to State & Federal Websites
Governor, CA Legislature, Cal/EPA, Congress, U.S. EPA - and more
SAFETY / SECURITY & TRAINING
DTSC Workshop on PFASs and their Alternatives in Food Packaging
Jan. 14th, 2020
Homeland Security Information Network (HSIN)
Members must login to view links
CUPA NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS
Hazardous Materials Business Plan - Presentation
CUPA Forum 2020 CICC Summary
IN THE NEWS!
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam - April.pdf
Clean Energy Legislation
Single-Use Plastics Report-2020_06.pdf
Pennsylvania Economic Impact of Single Use Plastic Report
California Challenges & Opportunities
Prior Months News Stories, Issues & Items, Flash and more ---
News, Weather & more
Today's News From MSNBC